2 posts tagged “war on terror”

Bad news first:

If the Iraqi Parliament refuses to pass the privatization legislation, Congress will withhold US reconstruction funds that were promised to the Iraqis to rebuild what the United States has destroyed there. The privatization law, written by American oil company consultants hired by the Bush administration, would leave control with the Iraq National Oil Company for only 17 of the 80 known oil fields. The remainder (two-thirds) of known oil fields, and all yet undiscovered ones, would be up for grabs by the private oil companies of the world...

Less bad news:

The [Iraqi] parliament today passed a binding resolution that will guarantee lawmakers an opportunity to block the extension of the U.N. mandate under which coalition troops now remain in Iraq when it comes up for renewal in December. Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, whose cabinet is dominated by Iraqi separatists, may veto the measure.
...
Without the cover of the U.N. mandate, the continued presence of coalition troops in Iraq would become, in law as in fact, an armed occupation...

Normally a nation voting for an end to outside assistance would be a good thing. But in this case the 'helpers' have a vested interest in 'helping', and may not react well to being thanked and shown the door.

The U.S. invested a lot of money in taking Iraq, and will have very few options open to it if Iraq tells them to leave.

1. They could simply leave. While the this is the morally correct option, the U.S. invested billions of dollars in the operation and is unlikely to accept no ROI.
2. They could start killing off Parliamentarians. This is achievable given the unique status of law and order in Iraq, but is more likely to sway pro-American politicains to push for withdrawl than frighten anti-American ones to quieting down.
3. They could kill all the Parliamentarians, install a new Saddam and abandon the 'democracy' pretense.
4. They could simply ignore the Iraqi government and continue as they are. The Iraqi armed forces are no match for the U.S. and would not be stupid enough to fight back, but could simply let the Iraqi resistance do it for them. Without Iraqi help in identifying it's enemies, the MNF-I could be seriousy bloodied.
   

The money America rightfully owes Iraq for rebuilding is not worth the loss of oil revenue* Iraq is being forced to sacrifice for it. Free of the MNF-I, Iraq could easily afford to rebuild itself.

* I assume that the '17' number in the first article is a typo for '27', else a person can reach colonel in the U.S. armed forces without being able to do basic math.

How to bomb a President:

For this you will need three mobile phones, a bomb and an observer. You will have to be on a straight road.

The first device will be a mobile phone hidden near a road. Call it as the Presidential motorcade approaches, and time how long between the helicopter jammer disconnects you and the President's car passes it (call this time t).

The next device is a bomb with a timer connected to the third mobile. Set the timer to explode in t seconds, and in a way that it becomes armed when the mobile cannot get a signal.

For better effect use a string of bombs to compensate for variance in speed between convoy and helicopter (which should be minimal due to the helicopter pilot being carefully selected by the Government).